Re: Why isn’t (>>>) a method?

Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:

Hello,

I wonder why (>>>) is an ordinary function instead of a method with a default implementation based on (.). The latter would make life easier in two ways.

But if you don't add some "instance Category...where (.)=...; id=...", then there are still problems! so compatibility is still an issue. and I have to say that your suggestion twists my mind a little bit. after all, Category is the super-class now. -Isaac