Re: 'temporary' package

* Jake McArthur [2014-05-07 08:38:29-0400]

It's more than just pushing a button. Who knows what kind of free time somebody has (they might only be able to bother with github stuff once a week...)

Having backup maintainers is the answer. http://ro-che.info/articles/2014-02-08-my-haskell-will.html

or what kind of procedures they have for verifying a package meets their standards before blessing it?

The change is trivial.

This seems unreasonable, to me.

Ok.

On May 7, 2014 8:36 AM, "Roman Cheplyaka" wrote:

...

No. In my opinion, there's no good reason why a package should remain broken for more than a day, given that there are people who has found, reported, and fixed the issue. All the actual work is done, now someone just has to push a button.

* Oliver Charles [2014-05-07 13:29:40+0100]

...

Isn't a 4 day turn around on a pull request a little hasty?

- ocharles

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:

...

Hi Max,

are you still maintaining the 'temporary' package? There's a breakage waiting to be fixed (with a patch): https://github.com/batterseapower/temporary/pull/12

If I don't hear from you in two days, I'll request maintainership and/or fork the package.

Roman

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries