24 Apr
2003
24 Apr
'03
2:26 a.m.
ketil@ii.uib.no (Ketil Z. Malde) writes:
I'm still not convinced that Codec.Image makes sense in isolation from a representation of "images". It's hard to see what you'd do with such a library without some other image handling stuff.
What do you mean - are you talking about a *module* Codec.Image as opposed to a directory (which is, AFAIK, the only suggestion previously on the table)?
Oh, never mind. I see now, it's the "Codec" prefix that's ailing you. -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants