30 Nov
2009
30 Nov
'09
6:28 a.m.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 07:48:56PM +0000, Duncan Coutts wrote:
I'm not really saying whether it should be the tf or fd version. I've not been taking part in that discussion.
You haven't missed anything. I think we're a long way off being ready to make a final choice between FDs and TFs. For one thing neither of them is standard, and both monads-* packages also require other non-standard extensions. But we are at the point where we can decide to make FDs optional, though that hasn't been decided yet either. That's not to say that the HP shouldn't present a pre-packaged choice (probably FDs for some time), just that it shouldn't get in the way of alternatives.