Re: The numeric c types are (effectively) integral, too.

Krzysztof Skrzętnicki writes:

I second this. The fact that time_t is sometimes uint or anything else is simply implementation detail (unless one can point to relevant standards that say otherwise). If one wishes to bet on this being true then simple private newtype with proper instances seems like the way to go. But it feels insecure to do otherwise.

+1 -- Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk