
27 Mar
2005
27 Mar
'05
2:30 a.m.
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
If classes were allowed to declare default methods for superclasses...
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
Robert Will has written a fully specified proposal for this. He calls it "delayed method definition", see http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~robertw/dessy/fun/, sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.2.
Looks like a really good idea to me.
Me too. I find the need to define superclass default methods all the time. That is an upward-compatible change that is very intuitive. -Yitz