Re: aeson and dlist in HP 2013.4.0.0

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Christian Maeder wrote:

If the proposal is to include (at least) 3 packages that are not ready yet (on hackage) and attoparsec raises the question about how two different parser packages should coexist in the HP then, I think, aeson disqualifies itself to be included into the next HP 2013.4.0.0. Let's discuss and reconsider it in 2014.

I think this is a bad idea, since nothing will have changed substantially between now and 2014, so we'll only be postponing a discussion we might as well have now. Erik