RE: Using Haddock for standard libraries (was: RE: ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 0.1, a Haskell documentation tool)

Simon Marlow wrote:

...

I'd like Haddock to become a widely-used Haskell documentation tool, but I don't want to presume to call it "the standard tool". . . . Nevertheless, we do *need* to document fptools/libraries in order that we (the GHC team) can release the next version of GHC.

Are there plans to integrate this with GHCi? So :info fmap would report the documentation?

I don't have any plans to do this (at least not in the short term), but it's a good idea. Simon