Re: Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

3 Oct 2015


      ...
...
...
...
...
Henrik Nilsson  writes:
...
Again, Graham and I were not saying "don't break things". We were saying "if
things are to be broken, then there had better be very compelling reasons".
...
That's a big difference.
You made a great argument, Henrik, and you've changed my enthusiastic +1 to
+0, until it can be bundled with some other, more necessary, breaking change.

John

Re: Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

John Wiegley