I have a qustion about a convention when writing a hierarchal library.
Lets say I have a library
A.B.C
with modules
A.B.C C1.hs C2.hs C3.hs
Is there a convention (official or not) as to when there is a parent module (in the example above, C.hs) that imports and re-exports the various sub-modules?
There are some suggestions here (see "Module naming conventions"): http://www.haskell.org/hierarchical-modules/libraries/layout.html Further ideas for fleshing this out are welcome.
For example, in the standard libraries, there is a Foreign module that re-exports most of Foreign.*. But there isn't a System.Posix; you have to import the System.Posix.Signal and System.Posix.Types individually.
There is a System.Posix. It's in the 'unix' package, but you don't have to say anything to get it: Prelude> System.Posix.epochTime >>= print Loading package unix ... linking ... done. 1054801650 Having the documentation separated into packages is perhaps the confusing thing here - System.Posix.Signals and System.Posix.Types are in the base package, whereas the rest of System.Posix is in the unix package. Cheers, Simon