Re: Proposal to add recvBuf and sendTo to Network.Socket

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:11:31PM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Simon Horman wrote:

...

One issue that has come up is that recvBufFrom calls getpeername() for each successful recvfrom(). This is unnecessary in the context of the code that I am working with as the result is discarded.

The network library is maintained by Johan, so you'd be best off talking to him directly. He's already doing a major rewrite of the library, so this is a good time to be bringing your question up :-)

Thanks, I'll get in touch with him off-list if he doesn't reply to this thread.