6 Nov
2010
6 Nov
'10
9:17 p.m.
On 11/06/10 11:53, Dmitry Astapov wrote:
One one hand, parsec 3 is more versatile, on the other hand, parsec 2 is often faster.
Is this even since parsec 3.1, whose main claim to fame was making parsec3 performance be comparable to parsec2 performance? http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-March/074076.html -Isaac