22 Oct
2006
22 Oct
'06
10:50 a.m.
On 10/21/06, Donald Bruce Stewart
Let's get join and split done! [snip] Now, the name, join conflicts, so: * consperse * connect * intercat * the problem with joinWith (or whatever) is that traditionally it would be joinBy
If we're going to have a split or splitBy then wouldn't the most logical name be unsplit or unsplitBy? I think consperse and intercat are cute, but not that good because they don't really tell me what's going on. I think 'connect' is too vague and overloaded. So yeah, my vote is with unsplitBy. On the other hand, whoever implments it should get to choose the name and just be done with it :) Anyway, just some fuel for the fire :) Jason