
10 Oct
2013
10 Oct
'13
7:46 p.m.
Simon Peyton-Jones
writes:
I believe my previous participation in that discussion was to promote (|>), but at this point I don't really care what it's called, I just think that this operator under any symbolic name should be present in an easily accessible location, preferably in base libs.
+1. I would very much like to see (&) in the base libs. I have projects that import lens only for the (&) and (??) (operator form of 'flip') operators! -- John Wiegley FP Complete Haskell tools, training and consulting http://fpcomplete.com johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net