17 Jan
2013
17 Jan
'13
1:44 a.m.
Hello, If I did not miss messages, many in favor of this proposal and no against. So, I think we reached clear consensus on splitting the network package. One problem is naming. The author of the "uri" package dislikes to rename it (to cgi-uri for example). So, I would like to take "network-uri" as I originally proposed. What do you guys think? --Kazu
Thanks. I will contact to him to ask the possibility.
Yaroslav Gridin said to me that "I'd rather not rename my package".
--Kazu
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries