26 Aug
2013
26 Aug
'13
9:18 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:41:43PM -0400, Edward Kmett wrote:
The argument in favor of using some 'o' combinator works even better on my side of the debate. ;)
I can coopt the suggestion of 'o' to say that you can use it for the few instances of IsString [Foo] that you want
But under your proposal (assuming you mean the original proposal), there wouldn't be an IsString [Foo] instance, would there? So o = fromString wouldn't work for [Foo]? Thanks Ian