20 Mar
2004
20 Mar
'04
11:42 a.m.
In an ideal world, we'd rename seq which is surely up there on the list of opaque, immemorable function names but, in this less than ideal world, using a different name for Seq would be good if someone can suggest one. (Sequence?)
Robert proposes CatenableSeq, which I like because it reflects closely the purpose of the type. Unless someone has a better idea along this lines, I'll make the change. Cheers, JP. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html