6 Jun
2012
6 Jun
'12
12:51 a.m.
On 6/5/12 9:35 PM, Conrad Parker wrote:
+1 to Kazu's suggestion to throw DivideByZero.
Another +1 from me. The essential nature of the function wouldn't be altered any, it'd just give a more precise error. Seems like an improvement regardless of how one feels about errors/exceptions/bottoms. Also, I think using DivideByZero is appropriate here. No need to invent a new exception type. -- Live well, ~wren