19 Jul
2014
19 Jul
'14
8:15 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 19/07/14 13:44, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
equating p x y = (p x) == (p y) How is this any different from the original proposed solution? I'm not sure what you mean. Is it not obvious? The original proposal is defined in terms of on. Mine is not.
- -- Alexander alexander@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlPKYX4ACgkQRtClrXBQc7WUyQD9EuL/D3sOlpa8ZqWTF7URRTfX fMVGqDLu0K/MdZL4sKoBAImJQ5rjR2aHWNKAHfKEIW2rLe0QDKmOjQcSVGyCEjYG =6bur -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----