
On 22 April 2014 01:41, Carter Schonwald
Hey all, if you agree that new proposals should be voted on in new/distinct threads (though can certainly be hammered out before hand), please chime in. This seems to come up a lot (at least in my naive following of the list) and if a new proposal appears in a thread you've already voted on, its hard to know curretly
thoughts?
I suppose the problem then is we have n different threads with slightly varying proposals, no way to keep them in sync or to even track them all (especially if someone comes late to the party and misses the other threads). I'm on the fence about this. IIUC, this is what Google Wave would have been good for... The other alternative would be to have explicitly numbered alternate proposals and people would actually state which one they were voting for. But I don't see that working well either.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 20/04/14 23:37, Carter Schonwald wrote:
can the people with new proposals do new threads, adding ammendments inline to a preexisting thread makes it really hard
a) to know who supports what b) make it visible to folks who've started ignoring the thread they've already voted on +1 ;-)
- -- Alexander alexander@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlNVB0wACgkQRtClrXBQc7UeSwEAqDC7LhAmeG2mNmSDQ9D33ulE +WIBcp4t66nD8H519XwA/jtSYbEZ+oq2DdtXIxAWDSeNDn53XyOiZdR4vpFCPzTm =cFB+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com http://IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com