27 Sep
2013
27 Sep
'13
9:40 a.m.
+1 for getDown
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Ben Millwood
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 06:16:57PM +1000, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
+1 from me as well; furthermore, how about an "unDown :: Down a -> a" record function or some such just to avoid the "\(Down x) -> x" usage like how Krzysztof described?
I vote for `getDown` as it's just not often enough I feel like my Haskell code is instructing me to party.
______________________________**_________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/librarieshttp://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries