Re: Why base 4.4.0.0 does not use default signatures extention (new in GHC 7.2)?

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 14:46 +0200, Bas van Dijk wrote:

On 22 September 2011 06:18, Maciej Marcin Piechotka wrote:

...

While the Functor f => (Pointed f =>) Applicative f => Monad f is still discussed the default methods would be a step towards the goal.

I like it. It's indeed a good step towards:

http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/DefaultSuperclassInstances

Why not formally propose this?

Done

Regards,

Bas

Regards