Re: Drastic Prelude changes imminent

On Tue Feb 03 2015 at 6:26:58 PM Erik Hesselink wrote:

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:

...

Now that I actually write this all out, I'm beginning to think I *am* opposed to the proposal overall, though not by a wide margin. It seems to fall into the "too little, too late" category: the benefits it brings are not massive due to my three points above, and the disruption introduced to the ecosystem is potential massive.

What is the potential massive disruption?

Erik

1. Breakage of existing code due to lack of type inference 2. Breakage of existing tutorials/documentation 3. Confusing error messages I didn't really want to drill into it because that seems to be the point of discussion of this entire thread.