30 Jan
2022
30 Jan
'22
12:19 a.m.
MonoFoldable isn't the answer either. That also has the problem of
requiring the same constraint for folding as for membership tests.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022, 12:12 AM PHO
On 1/30/22 9:59 AM, David Feuer wrote: [snip]
. I think the real answer is to remove `elem` from `Foldable` and put it somewhere more appropriate.
In a separate class? That would only help `elem` but not any other methods of Foldable. I'd rather love to see MonoFoldable[1] to be moved to base then.
[1]:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mono-traversable-1.0.15.3/docs/Data-Mono... _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries