13 Mar
2001
13 Mar
'01
6:08 p.m.
At 2001-03-13 09:04, Dylan Thurston wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 03:18:32PM +0000, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Ok, I acknowledge that. I think we seem to be gradually coming to a consensus on Marcin's point - that the functionality of a library should be paramount in the naming scheme, regardless of implementation, standardness, portability, etc. This is good.
With the exception of the Prelude, right?
Is a Prelude even necessary? Might it not be better to import what you want explicitly? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA