31 Mar
2015
31 Mar
'15
5:38 a.m.
On 2015-03-31 at 06:27:32 +0200, Chris Wong wrote: [...]
While it would be useful to have it in the Prelude, traverse_ doesn't fit either of the motivations above. So I think its omission is intended here.
That is not to say that it can't be proposed for inclusion... IOW, just turn the cautious "'traverse_' is not exported from Prelude [..] Is this intentional?"-question into an explicit/proper library proposal! Cheers, hvr