29 Nov
2010
29 Nov
'10
8:28 a.m.
On 29/11/2010 11:32, wren ng thornton wrote:
I'm not aware of any intention to do so, but I wholeheartedly approve of doing so. I'd probably leave fmap being called fmap though, in order to minimize breakage.
fmap = map This could be part of a legacy module, along with any other eliminated duplicated functions. Historical cruft remains in Haskell far too long; is there no desire for an occasional cleanup?