
Let me take that back. I forgot how weird Bifoldable and Bitraversable are
for product types and product-like types. Is this instance actually useful
for anything, or is it mostly confusing?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 9:46 PM David Feuer
I would go as far as to say we don't need to continue the proposal process here. We're doing it.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 9:44 PM David Feuer
wrote: This seems eminently reasonable to me. We must also be sure to add one to Data.HashMap if that's missing too.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 9:36 PM Joseph C. Sible
wrote: I'd like to propose a change to the containers package: adding a Bifoldable instance to Map. I briefly mentioned this on Reddit [1] and no obvious problems were brought up. I submitted a PR implementing it [2]. This seems like an obvious and straightforward instance to me. Thoughts?
Joseph C. Sible
[1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/fsgqd6/monthly_hask_anything_april... [2]: https://github.com/haskell/containers/pull/714 _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries