Re: Stop using "Int" for microsecond delays in "base"

Paul Johnson writes:

The "base" library has the "threadDelay" primitive, which takes an Int argument in microseconds.

I always end up with a wrapper around it, taking a NominalDiffTime; I could never be sure whether threadDelay interpreted its argument as milli-/micro-/nano-seconds without looking it up. For lack of Data.Time in base, how about Data.Fixed.Pico? Cheers, /Liyang