
My instinct about fromEither's type was the same as Carter's, and I had to
remind myself of fromMaybe. I like the name fromEither overall. Seems to
fit well with precedent and is straightforward enough.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 07:45 Oliver Charles
You may wish to compare with fromMaybe then, which probably also doesn't have the type you'd expect :) The type you have there is more like bifoldMap
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 1:42 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
I’d expect fromEither to be Either a b -> (a-> c )-> (b-> c) -> c
Nothing about the name fromEither is suggestive of the Either a a type
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:45 AM Oliver Charles
wrote: Regardless of having a more abstract version, I'm +1 on Jon's suggestion, and those names. fromEither is something I have reached for many many times and been surprised it's not within arms reach.
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 7:16 AM, Jon Purdy wrote:
I’m strongly for these:
Data.Tuple.dup :: a → (a, a)
Data.Either.fromEither :: Either a a → a
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries