Re: haddock: record types with partially exported fields

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:32:23AM +0200, David Waern wrote:

2008/6/5 Ross Paterson :

...

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 07:54:56PM +0200, David Waern wrote:

...

2008/5/28 Misha Aizatulin :

...

P.S. What's the right place to talk about haddock by the way?

haskelldoc@haskell.org

Could we have Haddock as a component on the GHC trac?

It seems approriate, with Haddock 2 so closely tied to GHC.

I'd rather see Haddock less tied to GHC, and for it to have it's own trac. But let's see what happens with the GHC documentation problem. If Haddock has to be bundled with GHC, it makes more sense for it to be in the GHC trac.

If you do want haddock to have its own trac instance then you can now create one on community, as described here: http://community.haskell.org/admin/using_project.html#trac Thanks Ian