Re: [PATCH] Split Data.IntMap into Data.IntMap.Strict and Data.IntMap.Lazy.

+1 for both .Strict and .Lazy. G On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Edward Kmett wrote:

We had both me and you weigh in on having both .Strict and .Lazy for consistency with the other libraries, and Milan weigh in on the other side. Going by a sheer vote count, then I think it'd be settled. Milan? -Edward On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:

...

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Milan Straka wrote:

...

We got opinions only from the proponent and both maintainers. I interpret the silence as the community being happy with the change.

Me too. Did we settle the issue of having both .Strict and .Lazy. I think we should. -- Johan

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

-- Gregory Collins