
17 Feb
2005
17 Feb
'05
4:13 p.m.
On 17 February 2005 15:42, Isaac Jones wrote:
Krasimir Angelov
writes: Hello Guys,
In the package description syntax are used ld-options and cc-options fields. In the same time the Haskell compiler options are options-ghc and options-hugs. Is there any objections to rename them to ghc-options and hugs-options? This is only better naming convention.
I have no objections if it's not too late for GHC 6.4.
Yes, fine by me. Simon