I'm pretty strongly -1 on this proposal.
Operator names are fairly precious, and nothing about this operator name
really screams "Maybe".
Seen in code without prior knowledge `fromMaybe` can have its meaning
intuited. (?:) on the other hand comes across as gratuitous.
-Edward
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Nikita Volkov
I suggest to include this operator in "Data.Maybe" and "Prelude".
*Implementation:*
(?:) :: Maybe a -> a -> a maybeA ?: b = fromMaybe b maybeA
*Use cases:*
1. maybeValue ?: error "Value is unexpectedly empty. This is a bug."
instead of
fromMaybe (error "Value is unexpectedly empty. This is a bug.") maybeValue
2. maybeA ?: maybeB ?: c
instead of
fromMaybe (fromMaybe c maybeB) maybeA
*Name collisions:*
Hayoo search gives only 6 collisions with 5 hardly fundamental libraries.
* The nickname and the operator itself are inspired by the ones from Groovy language.
** The symbols of the operator are a reminder of plain old ternary construct.
*** To understand the nickname look at the operator as on emoticon.
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries