Re: add Storable a => Storable (Ratio a) and Storable a => Storable (Complex a) to base

I dont care about Ratio a personally, but ed mentioned it when I asked for feedback about complex a I'm totally ok with narrowing the proposal to just Complex a IF that would remove any objections On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, John Lato wrote:

...

Rather it makes me question whether `Ratio a` itself makes sense, and perhaps we should monomorphize it to Integers.

I've been questioning that for a while, to be honest.

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries