Re: [Haskell-cafe] Faster timeout but is it correct?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Bas van Dijk wrote:

The most representative busyWontTimeout benchmark is the interesting one. Both the old and new score similarly while the event-manager based timeout is a modest 1.6 x faster. Since this is the most representative benchmark I'm beginning to favour this implementation.

That's nice, as it is also simpler than 'new'.

Thanks for reading my rambling,

Analysis of our core libraries are always great! Thanks, -- Felipe.