12 Jan
2011
12 Jan
'11
4:53 p.m.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Johan Tibell
So the baseline insertWith' is 35% faster than the Location-based insertWith' which is 7% faster than composing lookup and insert, on the "insertWith' update" benchmark.
Can we get the Location-based implementation to perform closer to the current implementation?
I tried to improve the performance today without much success (but much staring at Core). I wonder if the extra allocation of Path data constructors is hurting performance. Is it worth adding this Interface for all its coolness? Simply using 'lookup' plus 'insert' is simpler, as powerful, and only 7% slower. Johan