Greetings. I've been using the arch (tla) version control system for the Library Infrastructure Project. Since its designed to be distributed, arch has many advantages over a system like CVS. You can read about them here: http://web.verbum.org/blog/freesoftware/distributed-future So I'm thinking about how to proceed with the VC of LIP. Someone asked me to move it to the central CVS repository, and someone else asked if I would move it to darcs. I'm using arch at work, and since I'm interested in such system, I'm using darcs at home for my Debian packages (darcs is in Debian unstable now, by the way). Darcs is written in Haskell. I know I've harassed several of you to read about arch, so my question is, will anyone throw tomatoes at me if I switch to CVS or darcs? Is anyone else using my arch repository? By the way, the Library Infrastructure Project is still moving forward; I've been sending patches for stuff we'll need to the upstream author of HMake (CC'd). peace, isaac