Re: Proposal: add ifM and whenM to Control.Monad

...

...

...

...

Edward Kmett writes:

However, given that they keep getting reinvented with the exact same names and functionality. I'm finally ready to give in.

+1 from me.

How about a more general combinator, like om (name needed)? om :: Monad m => (a -> b -> m c) -> m a -> b -> m c om f m = (m >>=) . flip f whenM = om when unlessM = om unless etc. John