
2008/2/13, Ross Paterson
2008/1/23, David Waern
: 2008/1/23, Ross Paterson
: If I add the new-style attributes to the base package, it hides
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:35:28PM +0100, David Waern wrote: those
modules in the documentation for base, but packages that depend on base seem to generate links to locations in those hidden modules, e.g. uses of IO point at GHC.IOBase.IO.
I've now fixed this issue - a patch is available in the darcs repository.
OK, that seems to be fine now.
If you build the libraries in ghc-6.8.2 (with the added OPTIONS_HADDOCK pragmas) with haddock-2.1, Data-Array.html is almost empty. The old Haddock had problems with re-exports from another package:
* re-exported functions/types/classes were just shown as hyperlinked names without docs (the docs aren't stored in the interface file) * re-exported modules weren't shown at all (no reason that I can think of).
However the new haddock doesn't even show the re-exported names.
Oh, interesting. We should be able show the docs for re-exports, since the new Haddock do store them in the interface files. Thanks for the report, David