27 Jun
2009
27 Jun
'09
7:49 a.m.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Bart,
Saturday, June 27, 2009, 12:06:06 PM, you wrote:
and (2), we need a better name for it than "secret-base" or "ghc-base", maybe something like "base-internals"?
it's ghc-base, really
If it contains all of what is currently in base then it will continue to be shared by all the implementations. Thanks Ian