24 Jun
2008
24 Jun
'08
3:30 a.m.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
If a few more people could read this nice short policy and say "yes that looks fine, I agree" then that would be very helpful.
Yes, that looks fine, I agree :) I would prefer that a missing Maintainer field were a bug in the metadata instead of being semantically significant. Otherwise there would be no way of distinguishing between "I forgot to add my Maintainer line" and "I am not supporting this". -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/