26 Jan
2005
26 Jan
'05
4:41 a.m.
Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> writes:
At 08:56 25/01/05 +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
I think we all agree on having Time as an Integer or similar representing time with some particular resolution. The question seems to be how to deal with CalendarTime, defined as a record with fields for the various components found in a human-type time stamp.
Just for the record, my silence is not consent on this. [..] (days,ticks)
This (almost) falls in under "similar". Unless you feel this model subsumes the "calendar" type of time, in which case I'd like to see the reference as well. -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants