6 Nov
2014
6 Nov
'14
5:04 a.m.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Henning Thielemann < lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Michael Snoyman wrote:
David: I think the resistance you're seeing is coming from the fact that-
at least in my experience- liftMN is not considered good, idiomatic Haskell code,
Who does not consider it good or idiomatic and why? Lifting things through some stages of types is a common thing in Haskell, or not?
I wasn't talking about lifting as a general concept, I was comparing to <$> and <*>. From what I've seen of Haskell code in general, people use the operators far more often, and tend to recommend them to new users. Michael