
19 Aug
2013
19 Aug
'13
12:38 a.m.
Edward Kmett
writes:
As a result I'm -1 on this proposal.
That said, some kind of package that provides a well-reasoned Data.Tuple.Lazy data type could see use, as using it would imply consent to those semantics.
-1 to changing the product tuple instance, and +1 to moving those semantics into Data.Tuple.Lazy. -- John Wiegley FP Complete Haskell tools, training and consulting http://fpcomplete.com johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net