29 May
2003
29 May
'03
10:52 p.m.
Simon Marlow writes:
I think I'm proposing that if there's a review process, that it be adopted consistently rather than just for the haskell-libs project. Would you (Peter, or anyone else) like to put together a proposal for how this might work?
I think a pretty good starting point for this document can be found here: http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm Concerning the technicalities of the managing the repository (based on these reviews), this document might also be interesting: http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive/policy.html I'll give a few days to see how the discussion on this list develops, then I'll start compiling an outline, OK? Peter