21 Jul
2008
21 Jul
'08
5:23 p.m.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Duncan Coutts
I do understand the desire for that. The downside of course is that a lower level api has to be used very carefully to avoid breaking the promises provided by the higher level api.
True.
There is and it's not changed by Simon's proposal:
awaitSignal :: Maybe SignalSet -> IO ()
Actually, awaitSignal isn't the same as sigwaitinfo; the latter returns the siginfo_t for the received signal.