26 Apr
2014
26 Apr
'14
3:31 a.m.
I retract my bikeshedding attempt. On 25.04.14 8:18 PM, Dan Doel wrote:
In my code, I use (<&>) from lens when I need a flipped fmap:
let ys = xs <&> \x -> ...
and do use Applicative for.
Maybe & and <&> become standard at some point, and then I am maybe fine to use them. Only that "<&>", unlike "for", does not evoke any association to iteration in my brain. -- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. andreas.abel@ifi.lmu.de http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/