On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Smith
Does old code that handled these headers stop working, just because it was looking in the "other" section, but now needs to check a field dedicated to that header?
Yes, but it would be very sad if we couldn't do common header parsing because of this. I'd suggest that all the headers given in RFC 2616 be parsed and nothing else. That leaves the question of how we would handle the addition of any extra ones in the future. Firstly, packages could depend on a given version of this interface and we declare that the set of handled headers doesn't change within a major version. Better would be some static assertion that the interface doesn't handle some set of headers. Maybe there's a type trick to do this, but I can't think of one, so we might have to settle for a non static: checkUnparsedHeaders :: [String] -> IO () Which can be put in 'main' (or equivalent) and can call error if there's a mismatch. AGL -- Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org