On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 12:18 +0000, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi
1. In favor: - Twan van Laarhoven - Isaac Dupree - Don Stewart - Neil Mitchell
3. Opposed to any additions to the base library: - Bulat Ziganshin
Is concatMapM vs concat <$> mapM really such an improvement? Maybe the proposal should rather be to remove concatMap, for it is merely a 3-character shorter version of concat . map...
I don't think 4 people is quite enough to overrule one persons objections, so I'd suggest that anyone reading this thread who does want this to go in (as it stands, without generalisation) should shout up now. I'd guess another couple of me-too's is enough to have a consensus.
To add one more me-too, Matthew Naylor (http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/) says:
(+1) Me too.
Thanks
Neil _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries